Mitra, who a biology professor at the College of Staten Island, came down for the citizen scientists, showing through several bird species examples how official guides willfully overlooked several species--counting them as an unremarkable subspecies, invasive escaped pets or just rare lost souls. Then when a committee somewhere declared it was a legitimate species, people started reporting more of them.
Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis
Courtesy of Ucumari |
Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii
The Cackling Goose was dismissed as a a subspecies of the Canada Goose. So nobody counted it and it was "grossly overlooked," Mitra says. Then in 2004 the American Ornithology Union decided that this much smaller bird that breeds in the arctic and winters in the west from Oregon to Mexico really is a separate species. That manmade distinction always makes the birds more interesting to people, Mitra says.Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea
Courtesy of Reders |
"When people did not have the predisposition to think they would find arctic terns," Mitra says, "they did not find arctic terns."
There was much grumbling in the crowd toward the arrogance and whimsy of the ornithological authorities that seem to have birders under their thumb. Assuming that we know more than we really do about the species in an area can lead to lousy identification and conservation. If you assume you know exactly what birds, plants and animals need protecting, you may only protect their specialized habitat and overlook more prosaic landscapes that will save an animal you haven't thought of 100 years from now. Of course, this kind of thinking is what leads to boring wildlife preserves, but better mundane preserves than none at all.
Where to See Wild Animals Around New York City
No comments:
Post a Comment